Sunday, September 28, 2014

Molesworth/Barthes - Whitney Ratliff

Painting is not dead! 


Helen Molesworth, a chief curator at the Museum of Contemporary Art of Los Angeles, talks about some of her exhibitions and the conflicting issues she had with chronological sequencing. She says by placing photos in slideshows in chronological order or in groups by the decade, seemed boring and that that language isn't as influential alone but the images are more influential outside of that language, and that the language around the decade was so strong, it was so out of favor. If she reconfigured it outside of that language, she felt like the work itself emerged in a different way. By historizing the work in the moment made the work itself feel tainted.

The impact of criticism has on an art form is perceived by the culture, based on what is popular or in demand. "Criticism doesn't function in a highly speculative market, criticism functions in a depressed market where consensus building is more of the aim of the goal." Critics is a harder and rarer career to make. "The language of criticism and the impulse of criticism got pulled up in non-institutionally affiliated culturial projects. (I think that is what she said) A lot of the gravitas that were traditionally appointed to a critic was given to the curator." Critics and curators have essentially become one and the same but each holds its own fundamental goal to present the work and respect it as it is as well as what it is not.


Barthes
"Of course this epithet, to which we turn and return out of weakness or fascination (parlor game: discuss a piece of music without using a single adjective), has an economic function: the predicate is always the rampart by which the subject's image-repetoire protects itself against the loss that threatens it: the man who furnishes himself or is furnished with an adjective is sometimes wounded, sometimes pleased, but always constituted, music has an image-repretoire whose function is to reassure, to constitute subject, who hears it (would this be because music is dangerous--an old Platonic notion? Leading to ecstasy, to loss, as many examples from ethnography and popular culture would to show?)"

- Barthes, Grain of the Voice, pg 267-8

"The romantic "heart," an expression in which we no longer perceive anything but an edulcorated metaphor, is a powerful organ, extreme point of the interior body where, simultaneously and as though contradictorily, desire and tenderness, the claims of love and the summons of pleasure, violently merge: something raises my body, swells it, stretches it, bears it to the verge of explosion, and immediately, mysteriously, depress it, weakens it."

- Barthes, The Romantic Song, pg 289

"It is because Schumann's music goes much father than the ear, it goes into the body, into the muscles by the beats of its rhythm, and somehow into the viscera by the voluptuous pleasure of its melos: as if on each occasion the piece was written only for one person, the one who plays it; the truth Schumannian pianist -- c'est moi."

-Barthes, Loving Schumann, pg 295

These were just a view quotes I thought captured a good essence of each written piece by Barthes. Barthes does a great job analyzing the art of music and how it is presented poetically to the ear of its listeners. He describes current uses of work, such as the piano as a "nouvelle cuisine uncooked", most likely referring to current performances as being not as powerful or mesmerizing in good fashion as it once was when the piano was presented for a few listeners and more private performances of higher status. Music to the ear, is an intimate relationship between the listener who envelopes oneself into the work with great passion. It stimulates the ear into a state of euphoria in an emergence of pleasure and love. However, the voice as he describes in The Romantic Song, portrays two different sides that can be best summarized as being good and evil. A light and dark voice, one that displays an amorous, unisexual role within society towards love and passion or a demonic, diabolic evocation that divides, separates, dissociates, and dismembers the body.  Both affect the lost, the abandoned subject that the romantic song sings.

Monday, September 22, 2014

Shows at which to Shmooze

Ok, here are a few more options. One of them is in Denton, for those of you who hate to drive.

There's a Panel on Art in New York during the 80's on Tuesday at the Fort Worth Modern. Those of you thinking about what kind of art careers you might like to have can find models to emulate or work against here:

http://glasstire.com/events/2014/09/18/panel-urban-theater-new-york-art-in-the-1980s/


Michelle Mackey, Marcelyn McNeal, and Lorraine Tady at TWU September 30th

http://glasstire.com/events/2014/09/18/michelle-mackey-marcelyn-mcneil-lorraine-tady/


Aways in the back

This lecture was interesting mainly because it supports the idea that it the small, or less noticed, actions in time that make the large events that end up making history. Society would like for us to believe that great ground breaking events and people come to be as an instant influential force, that they were born that ground shacking, ignoring all the details leading and making up that said event. Really, these great people were influence and inspirited be so called smaller forces that made them who they are, and that they themselves are a small part of a even bigger movement. Everything big starts from the back door to become the front door.

Kenneth Goldsmith - Whitney Ratliff

"Poetry, today, occupies the position that conceptual art once held in the art world. Conceptual art was in its inception an act of resistance, one through the dematarialization called into question the status of the unique art object and the sole privilege of the author propose that art can be made by anyone regardless of their skill set. And it also claimed that art could have democratic distributions able to be experienced by all. Of course we know today that conceptual art has been thoroughly degraded into the canon of art history and has acquired great value. And yet its original utopian ethos lives on continually providing much needed framework, strategies of resistance, and roadmaps of art dematerialized, and radical democratic, digital world." - Kenneth Goldsmith (At 20 minutes)




Goldsmith talks about using the back door as the front door and how poetry is important and how using the back door is, for most of the time, the better way to into the art world. He explains in further detail poetry in relationship of conceptual work and continued by individually looking at artworks and explaining their construction and meaning about the piece and its relationship with the much wider world during a certain timeframe in history.

He later lists off everything society is doing such as tweeting, talking, facebooking etc except for paying attention to the art on the wall, that the art on the wall has become secondary to everything else in the world. No one is stopping to smell the roses. Everyone is in a rush, constantly wanting an instantaneous relationship with others and not understanding the meaning behind the art on the wall and stopping to enjoy the moment or to go and see a person in person rather than creating this distance between others and holding that relationship as more important than actually facing the person physically.

Sunday, September 21, 2014

Clarification...

Hey everyone. It seems people are confused about what to blog on for tomorrow. Unfortunately, my email just stopped working altogether and I can't send the response where I set the record straight, but here's a link to the podcast you should be listening to: http://www.themodern.org/sites/default/files/kenneth_goldsmith3.25.14.mp3


Sorry for the confusion. You also should have pdfs for the Roland Barthes reading for next week, but if not I'll resend those once my email starts working again.

Mike